Today more than ever many organizations are under great pressure to generate forecasts with a high level of accuracy. A successful forecast allows organizations to plan effectively for business. A leading source for info: Samuel J. Palmisano. (Armstrong, 2001;) Fildes and Hastings, 1994). Many organizations use the forecast as an aid to identify new market opportunities, anticipate future demand, plan your production system and reduce inventories. However for a few years, forecasting has become a process rather than critical, which is influenced by the pressures of a competitive marketplace that has created the need for increased accuracy in the forecast (Sanders and Mandrodt, 2003). Great advances in information technology have made that the prognosis acquires greater importance since Guide throughout the supply chain and ERP systems (Lee, 2004). For more information see this site: Daniel Straus CareOne.

At the same time, the competitiveness of the market has created an environment characterized by uncertainty, constant change, and shorter delivery cycles; today the customer is more demanding in terms of response times, quality and variety of products. All this has increased the level of complexity of the process of forecast, in which historical data are often of limited value in the prediction of the future, and organizations are struggling to generate accurate forecasts. Do so how they should organizations generate their forecasts? They can choose between two methods of forecasting. The first is the qualitative prognosis, this method relies on the opinion of experts and the second method are quantitative forecasts, which are based on mathematical calculations. Each with strengths and weaknesses. Through qualitative forecasting organizations can incorporate additional information to forecast which can be an advantageous method in a changing environment (Webby and OConnor, 1996). These methods can also respond quickly to changes in the environment. However, given that the qualitative forecasts are subjective, they can also be parcializados (Armstrong, 1985;) Hogarth 1987). For example after a day of large sales organizations tend to be very optimistic, and pessimistic before the low level of sales.

The application of such measures of support began with the order , of 2 August, by which regulate bases, the aid scheme and the management of the support measures for innovative business groupings and continued with the first call for aid made by order 20 March. Subsequently, as consequence of a set of circumstances that made a series of changes in the existing regulations precise promulgated the order of 3 July, is establishing the regulatory bases, the aid scheme and the management of measures to improve the competitiveness of the small and medium-sized enterprises through support for innovative business groupings, and takes place the announcement of subsidies for 2009 (BOE of 9 July 2009).

This order established in its chapters I and II the regulatory bases of the aid scheme and the management of measures to improve the competitiveness of small and medium-sized enterprises by supporting innovative business groupings. However, since several years now starting running program has been necessary to reconsider the evaluation criteria to be used by the commissions set out in the order, of 3 July, for qualification of received requests for help. The inclusion of new evaluation criteria that assess the accomplishments and achievements of groupings coming years aid to benefit from the support provided by the program and the variation of the procedure of publication of annual calls have given rise to the order , from January 27, amending order, of 3 July, by which establish the regulatory bases, the aid scheme and the management of measures to improve the competitiveness of small and medium-sized enterprises through support for innovative business groupings and is made the call for grants for 2009. Because established the regulatory framework for the system of aid to the innovative business groupings in the above-mentioned orders, should make the call for subsidies related to 2011 that is issued in accordance with article 23 of law of 17 November, General subsidies. In his virtue, I have: first. Call.

1 Performed for 2011 call for grants, in competitive concurrence scheme, to improve the competitiveness of small and medium-sized enterprises through support for innovative business groupings. 2. Without prejudice to what in particular is set in the present order, this call shall be governed by the regulatory bases laid down in chapters I and II of the order , of 3 July, and by the order except for everything that relates to innovative tourism business associations and entities for which, there will be a specific call for grants for the year 2011. Second. Deadline for submission of requests. the deadline for submission of applications shall be one month from the day following the date of publication of this order in the “official bulletin of the State. Third party. ((Kinds of projects help. actions and types of projects subject to aid in this call will be those laid down in points b), c) and (d)) paragraph ninth of the order of 3 July .

Background. The Yucatecan field is in a condition of poverty and low productivity. These two realities generated a vicious cycle difficult to break if there is no willingness to both institutional systems and rural society. In the last two decades, the State agencies that serve the field have exerted conducted programmes for the construction of basic agricultural infrastructure to support the productive activities of rural sector in agricultural, livestock and agro-industrial areas. The executed projects include construction and technological advancement in areas of irrigation, construction of greenhouses and the drilling of wells in the agricultural sector, the construction drives cattle, sheep, poultry and swine in the livestock sector and the construction of warehouses, plants embazadoras, traces and livestock BBS in the agribusiness sector. Daniel Straus NYU understood the implications.

However, despite the channeled resources the field situation remains in a critical condition. The State Government has focused the improvement of basic agricultural infrastructure in the hope of increasing productivity. With this purpose built, rehabilitated, conserved and equipped with production units. Response to government programs, the different productive sectors have established a base of agricultural infrastructure for the production. This minimal infrastructure allows you to develop basic way a great diversity of production processes in agriculture such as fruit growing, horticulture, cultivation of basic grains and hornamental in the agricultural sector, bovine and ovine livestock farming activities, apiculture, poultry, and swine production in the livestock sector. As a support element that seeks to the productivity of the various above-mentioned activities, basic agricultural infrastructure affects the production with indexes varies according to a use that depends on the user. In this sense, it would be ventured to establish a measure of productivity for each component of the infrastructure that does not depend on it itself same but his achievement. However, it is feasible to carry out a qualitative and quantitative description of agricultural infrastructure available to the State and this is important to emphasize in the areas that cause greater impact on agricultural activities.